The Brick that Saves It's Self
Written by: David Carneal – Digital Efficiency Consulting Group – DECG
Read Time: 3 min
The myth: standardization kills creativity
People hear ‘standardize’ and picture a beige cubicle where ideas go to retire.
LEGO proved the opposite: once they reduced part chaos, they got faster and more creative because the system stopped fighting itself.
Constraints don’t choke creativity. They give it leverage.
- What a one-page standard should include:
- Purpose (one sentence)
- Inputs required (and where they come from)
- The default steps (7 or fewer)
- Owner + backup owner
- Top 3 exceptions and what to do
- Definition of done
What standardization really is (and what it isn’t)
Standardization isn’t ‘one way forever.’ It’s ‘one default until we learn a better default.’
It’s a shared starting point, so every team doesn’t reinvent the same wheel, badly, in different fonts.
- What a one-page standard should include:
- Purpose (one sentence)
- Inputs required (and where they come from)
- The default steps (7 or fewer)
- Owner + backup owner
- Top 3 exceptions and what to do
- Definition of done
A concrete example: quotes, orders, and the ‘creative’ free-for-all
Take quoting. If every rep can invent a quote layout, discount rule, and approval path, you don’t have a sales process. You have improv theater.
Standardization here doesn’t mean removing judgment. It means creating a default quote package and a short list of approved options.
Then, if someone wants to go off-menu, that’s fine. They just do it knowingly, with an approval rule, and with the exception logged so it doesn’t become the new normal by accident.
The 3-layer model: where to standardize first
If you try to standardize everything at once, you’ll create… wait for it… more complexity. Start with these layers.
- Layer 1: Inputs (what comes in)
- Required fields on forms
- Naming conventions
- Data definitions (one meaning for one number)
- Layer 2: The default workflow (what people do)
- Steps that don’t change 80% of the time
- Who approves what
- What ‘done’ looks like
- Layer 3: Exceptions (what breaks the default)
- A short list of allowed exceptions
- An escalation rule
- A place to log exceptions so you can eliminate them later
- What a one-page standard should include:
- Purpose (one sentence)
- Inputs required (and where they come from)
- The default steps (7 or fewer)
- Owner + backup owner
- Top 3 exceptions and what to do
- Definition of done
Make the standard easy to follow (or it won’t be followed)
Standards fail when they live in a binder, a SharePoint graveyard, or a PDF nobody can open on the floor.
A good standard is more like a recipe card than a textbook: short, visual, and located where the work happens.
If people ‘forget’ the standard, it’s usually not because they’re rebellious. It’s because the standard is hard to access or harder to understand.
- What a one-page standard should include:
- Purpose (one sentence)
- Inputs required (and where they come from)
- The default steps (7 or fewer)
- Owner + backup owner
- Top 3 exceptions and what to do
- Definition of done
Micro Steps
- Quick win recipe (30 minutes):
- Pick one high-frequency task
- Write the ‘default path’ in 7 steps or less
- List the top 3 exceptions
- Decide who can approve exceptions (and who can’t)
- Publish it where work happens (not where policies go to nap)
Guardrails
- Guardrails that keep standards from becoming bureaucracy:
- Standards are defaults, not shackles
- Exceptions require a reason code (one sentence)
- If an exception happens 5 times, it becomes a candidate for a new standard
- Review standards monthly, not annually
If your process requires heroics, it’s not a process. It’s a hostage situation.
Build a solid default. Let exceptions earn their keep. Your team will move faster with less stress and fewer surprises.
Standard work isn’t anti-people. It’s pro-time. It gives your team their brain back.
CTA: Write one ‘standard menu’ for a process and publish it where people actually work.
Footnotes
- Roland Berger (2019) – Restacking the rules of innovation
- The Guardian (2017) – How Lego clicked: the super brand that reinvented itself
